 |
| Proposed riding boundaries coloured in by 2011 result |
Last week, a new company called
pollmaps.ca released their data in looking at the proposed riding boundaries and taking a look
at the 2008 and 2011 federal election on the proposed map. In August,
the final provinces came out with their proposed maps for the ongoing
redistribution process which will ad 30 seats to the House of
Commons. Pollmaps.ca did the math and now we know how the results of
the last election will play out on the new map. Even though the map
isn't finalized, it's nice to see how it will play out and which
parties are the winners and losers.
As it turns out, and as
expected, the Tories are the big winners. The boundary proposal would
give them an extra 25 seats. They would gain 13 seats in Ontario, 6
in Alberta, 7 in BC and 1 in Newfoundland while they would actually
lose a seat in Quebec, and 2 in Saskatchewan. The NDP would also gain
seats, but only a net gain of 8; 5 in Quebec, 2 in Ontario, 2 in
Saskatchewan, 1 in Manitoba and a loss of 2 in BC. The Liberals would
be the big losers. Despite the House of Commons increasing in seats,
the proposed boundaries would result in the Liberals actually losing
seats. They would lose 1 seat in Newfoundland, and 1 in Manitoba for
a net loss of 2. The BQ would also lose 25% of their seats, going
down from 4 to 3.
Here are where the
party changes would happen by province:
British Columbia
BC is set to gain 6 seats in the House of Commons, which puts them at
42 seats. Not only do the Tories gain all eight of these new seats,
the boundary changes give them an extra 2 at the expense of the NDP.
South Cowichan—Juan de Fuca
NDP +1
This is the brand new riding on Vancouver Island. When it comes to
the new boundaries in BC, Vancouver Island is the only glimmer of
hope for the party. This new riding is being created out of two
current NDP ridings: Esquimalt—Juan de Fuca and Nanaimo—Cowichan.
This has created a new NDP seat, but one where they would have only
won by 115 votes. Another glimmer of hope for the NDP on the island
is the riding of Nanaimo—Alberni which became considerably more
friendly for them. The NDP would have lost the riding by just 1270
votes.
South Okanagan—West Kootenay
Conservatives
+1, NDP
-1
This riding would be the successor riding to
the present riding of British Columbia Southern Interior. This riding
is currently held by the NDP, but thanks to redistribution, the
riding becomes a Conservative seat. The riding loses some strong NDP
areas in its southeastern corner around Nelson, and gains some
ultra-Conservative areas of Okanagan—Coquihalla around Penticton.
The results turns this safe NDP seat into a seat where the Tories
would have won by almost 3000 votes or about 5%.
Vancouver—Granville
Conservatives +1
Earlier I
discussed how I figured this new riding in Vancouver would become a
safe Tory seat. The numbers tell us however that while the Tories
would have won this seat in 2011, it would have been a very close 3
way race. The NDP as it turns out would have only lost by 1654 votes.
This is thanks in part to strong NDP areas of Vancouver Kingsway and
Vancouver East joining the riding. However, they are not enough to
compensate for the strong Tory areas coming in from Vancouver Quadra
and Vancouver South.
Burnaby North—Seymour
Conservatives +1
This is a new riding that takes in parts of the
NDP held riding of Burnaby—Douglas and the Tory held riding of
Vancouver North. While most of the riding comes from Bunaby—Douglas,
the Seymour area over Vancouver North is a strong Conservative area,
while the north end of Burnaby is more evenly split between the two
parties. The result gives the Tories a 4317 vote edge in this riding,
or nearly 10% of the vote.
Port Moody—Coquitlam
Conservatives
+1, NDP
-1
This
riding comes mostly out of the existing riding of New
Westminster—Coquitlam. However, that riding is losing New
Westminster, which is a strong NDP area. The riding was already a
close one with New Westminster, and the loss of that region would
make the riding NDP by just 65 votes. But, thanks to a small
Conservative slice of Port Coquitlam, this riding would turn Tory
blue by just 361 votes. A toss up yes, but still a Tory gain from the
current map.
Surrey
Conservatives
+2, NDP
-1
Surrey
is getting one new riding after redistribution, and instead of being
an even 2-2 split as the case is now, the Tories would double their
seat total in the city, reducing the NDP to 1. The NDP would be left
with the riding of West Surrey—Whalley which is the successor
riding to Surrey North which they currently hold. The other current
NDP held seat is Newton—North Delta which was a 3 way race in the
last election and is being split into 3 different ridings. The NDP
part of the riding is being given to the riding of Delta which is
outside of Surrey entirely. The rest of Delta is Conservative, and
adding North Delta would not change it. The Liberal part of the
riding is being added to the West Surrey—Whalley riding which is an
NDP riding anyways. Finally, the Tory part of the riding is being
given to the super safe Tory seat of South Surrey—White Rock. This
all results in a net loss for the NDP. The two Conservative ridings
in Surrey are morphing into 4 ridings which are also being cut out of
the two NDP ridings and also nearby Langley, which is also a safe
Tory area. The resulting ridings would be North Surrey—Guildford
(out of parts of North Surrey and Fleetwood—Port Kells), Surrey
Centre (mostly out of Fleetwood—Port Kells), Langley—Cloverdale
(out of parts of Fleetwood—Port Kells, South Surrey—White Rock
and Langley) and Surrey—White Rock which gains part of Newton—North
Delta but also loses some territory to Langley—Cloverdale. Out of
these new ridings, Surrey Centre becomes the lowest hanging fruit for
the NDP, even though it is mostly carved out of the currently Tory
held seat of Fleetwood—Port Kells. However, it would mostly
consist of the East Newton area of the city which the NDP does well
in. Richmond
East & Delta
Conservatives
+1This
region south of Vancouver is set to gain one extra seat as
Delta—Richmond East is splitting into 2 ridings. This riding is a
very Conservative to begin with. If a safe Tory seat splits into two,
that means two safe Tory seats. Delta is gaining some NDP areas in
North Delta from Newton—North Delta, however that is not enough to
even make the seat competitive.
Alberta
Conservatives +6
At present, every seat except one in Alberta is
held by the Tories. That one opposition seat, Edmonton—Strathcona
is held by the NDP. The redistribution process does that carve up
that riding, but does not make any other parts of the province land
in opposition territory, at least not with the 2011 election results.
As a result, Alberta is getting six more ridings, all of them would
have gone Tory last election.
Saskatchewan
Saskatchewan is not seeing an increase in
ridings, however the boundary commission has decided to rectify the
issue with current gerrymandered “rurban” ridings that have
benefited the Conservatives the last few election cycles. At present,
there are 8 rurban ridings in the province that cut up the two major
cities of Saskatoon and Region into pizza slices extending into the
rural areas surrounding them. This has caused the NDP leaning central
parts of those cities to be dwarfed by the Conservative leaning
suburban and rural parts that dominate most of those eight ridings.
Only one of those eight ridings is held by an opposition MP, with
Wascana going Liberal thanks to the personal popularity of MP Ralph
Goodale. The commission proposed giving each city 2 more urban
oriented ridings, which would cause the province to give the NDP two
seats (up from none), at the expense of the Conservatives.
Regina—Lewvan
NDP +1,
Conservatives
-1
Regina is set to get two strictly urban
ridings, Wascana (which loses most of its rural territory) and the
new riding of Regina—Lewvan, which would consist of the western
half of the city. Under the new boundaries, Wascana would remain a
Liberal seat, while Regina—Lewvan would become an NDP seat.
Regina—Lewvan takes in some strong NDP areas of Palliser with some
mixed territory from Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre. The result would
give the NDP a 1005 vote victory.
Saskatoon Centre—University
NDP +1,
Conservatives
-1
Saskatoon is also set to get two urban ridings,
Saskatoon Centre—University and Saskatoon West. Saskatoon
Centre—University would go NDP with 2011's results, while the more
suburbam Saskatoon West would still go Conservative. Saskatoon Centre
takes in the more NDP-friendly central part of the city, which is
mostly taken from the riding of Saskatoon—Rosetown—Biggar. But,
it also takes in some more Tory-leaning suburban areas in the
northeast part of the city from Saskatoon—Humbold. The result is a
seat that would have narrowly gone NDP in 2011, by a margin of 204
votes. Saskatoon West would also be an NDP target though, as they
would have narrowly lost the riding by 1639 votes.
Manitoba
NDP +1,
Manitoba would not get any new ridings either.
However, the new boundaries of Winnipeg North would give the
NDP an extra seat in the province to the expense of the Liberals.
Winnipeg North is a traditional NDP seat that the Liberals have
recently picked up thanks to the popularity of its MP, Kevin
Lamoureux. Even having said that though, Lamoureux only won the
riding by 44 votes in 2011. Any adjustment to his riding is surely
going to put his narrow victory in jeopardy. The riding as it is, is
very polarized between east and west. The commission proposes taking
a small part of the Liberal western part of the riding (in the
Maples) and giving it to the neighbouring riding of Kildonan—St.
Paul. This alone would be enough to flip the riding to the NDP.
However, the commission also proposes adding part of Kildonan—St.
Paul (Garden City, Jefferson & Seven Oaks) to the riding. While
this area went Tory in 2011, the Liberals finished third behind the
NDP and therefore would not be enough to compensate for the loss of
part of the small Liberal part of the riding being lost. All these
changes would not only give the NDP a victory in this riding, but the
Liberals would drop to third, 7.6% behind.
Ontario
Ontario is set to gain 15 new ridings with
redistribution. Out of those 15 ridings, the Tories would have won a
net of 13 in the last election on the proposed boundaries while the
NDP would have gained a net of two.
Welland—Fort Erie
Conservatives
+1, NDP
-1
This is the successor riding to the NDP-held
riding of Welland. However, growth in the Niagara Region has forced
the riding of Welland to change its borders, meaning that the NDP
would lose its seemingly perfectly tailored riding. The problem for
the NDP is that no area outside of the riding seems to have much
history with the party, so, for the riding to change its boundaries
at all is bad news for them. With its current boundaries, the NDP won
Welland by about 1000 votes. However, the proposed boundaries add
Fort Erie to the riding, and Fort Erie voted heavily Conservative in
2011. This addition is enough to flip the riding and give it to the
Tories by a margin of 2095 votes.
Brampton—Gore
NDP
+1, Conservatives
-1
The current riding of Bramalea—Gore—Malton
has become much too large, and needs to shrink. The boundary
commission decided to removed all of Bramalea and some of Malton from
the riding, creating the new riding of Brampton—Gore. This change
would have caused the riding to go NDP if you look at the 2011
numbers. That's because of the personal strength of the NDP candidate
in the riding, Jagmeet Singh who had narrowly lost the riding. He was
popular in the Sikh community in the riding which dominates the Gore
and Malton parts of the riding. Without Conservative leaning
Bramalea, he would have won the riding by 2363 votes. Singh went on
to win the riding provincially in last Fall's provincial election.
Unless the NDP can run a popular candidate like him again, this may
not necessarily be an “NDP riding”.
Don Valley East
Liberals +1,
Conservatives -1
One of the few gains the Liberals would have
under the proposed boundaries is in this riding. The proposed riding
of Don Valley East is set to gain some strong Liberal areas from Don
Valley West such as the Flemingdon Park neighbourhood. This change
would turn a narrow 870 vote loss in 2011 into a 1221 vote victory.
St. Paul's
NDP +1, Liberals
-1
With the huge condo boom in neighbouring
Trinity—Spandina, the boundary commission was forced to lump off a
large part of that NDP-held riding and add it to St. Paul's. To
compensate for this, the riding lost a large chunk of territory in
its eastern end. This area also happened to be a Strong Liberal and
NDP-dead zone. While the NDP still finished third in the western part
of St. Paul's, it wasn't as bad as in the eastern part. Throw in a
few polls from NDP Davenport, and the NDP would have won the new St.
Paul's by 1335 votes.
Toronto Centre
NDP +1, Liberals
-1
The condo boom
seen in Trinity—Spadina is also happening in Toronto Centre,
forcing that riding to shed some of its territory as well. The
commission removed the well-off Liberal leaning northern half of the
riding where the NDP finished in a distant 2nd.
This still wouldn't have been enough for the riding to go NDP
however, but with the commission adding a number of polls from
Trinity—Spadina, the NDP would have won this new riding- but by
just 195 votes.
Mount Pleasant
Liberals +1
So, with all those well-off Liberal leaning
areas being shed from St. Paul's and from Toronto Centre, a new
riding had to be created to house them. The commission put those
areas and a small part of Don Valley West and put it in the new
riding of Mount Pleasant. This riding would be a fairly safe Liberal
seat, which they would have won by 5440 votes over the Tories.
Markham—Unionville
Conservatives +1,
Liberals -1
Under the proposed redistribution, the only
Liberal seat left in York Region would be evaporated. The seat of
Markham—Unionville was won by the Liberals by just 1700 votes. The
boundary commission has decided to divide this riding up. Most of
Markham—Unionville will actually find itself in the new riding of
Markham, except for the Unionville area, which will continue to be in
a riding called Markham—Unionville, but will also include a large
swath of Markham north of the present riding. Most of the Liberal
neighbourhoods in Markham—Unionville will find themselves in the
new riding of Markham. Without Unionville, this riding would have
gone Liberal easily. However, the commission also added a large part
of the Thornhill riding to Markham. Thornhill has become very
Conservative, and this new territory would throw the riding into
Conservative hands by a 944 vote margin.
Scarborough East
Liberals +1
The boundary
commission has decided to do away with the Pickering—Scarborough
East riding which was a strange riding that straddled the
Toronto-Pickering border. This decision has meant that the old half
riding that stuck out of the city has moved entirely within the city.
The Scarborough half of the Pickering—Scarborough East riding voted
Liberal in 2011, creating the base of this new riding. Parts of
Scarborough—Rouge River and Scarborough—Guildwood were also added
to the riding, but while the Liberals finished 2nd
in both of those areas (to the NDP and Conservatives respectively),
it was not enough to alter their lead. In total, the Liberals would
have won this seat by 1286 votes.
New ridings resulting in Conservative gains
Conservatives +13
The rest of the Tory gains came from new
ridings being created in their favour in fast growing suburban areas.
The Tories gained 13 such ridings:
Splitting of Nepean—Carleton into Nepean and
Nepean—Carleton
Splitting of
Ancaster—Dundas--Flamborough--Westdale into Ancaster and
Waterdown—Glanbrook
Splitting of Halton into Milton and Halton
Creation of Kitchener South—North
Dumfries—Brant from Brant, Cambridge and Kitchener—Conestoga
Creation of Mississauga Centre from
Missississauga—Erindale, Mississauga East—Cooksville and from
Mississsauga—Brampton South
Splitting of Brampton West into Brampton South
and Brampton West
Splitting of Brampton—Springdale into
Brampton North and Brampton Centre
Creation of Don Valley North from Don Valley
East and Willowdale
Splitting of
Oak Ridges—Markham into Oak Ridges, Aurora—Richmond Hill and
into Markham—Stouffville (+2)
Splitting of Markham—Unionville into Markham
and Markham—Unionville. (See also Markham—Unionville above, as
this is a Liberal riding being split into two Tory ones)
Splitting of Barrie in Barrie North and Barrie
South
Creation of Kawartha Lakes—Port Hope—Cobourg
from Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock and from
Northumberland—Quinte West.
Quebec
Quebec will be gaining three seats with
redistribution. The NDP, which swept the province in 2011 has the
most to gain from the proposed map. It would gain five seats, taking
a BQ and a Tory seat along with the three new ridings.
Saint-Leonard
NDP +1, Liberals
-1
This riding is the successor to the Liberal
held riding of Saint-Leonard—Saint-Michel. However, the riding
becomes very different. Gone is the heavily Liberal neighbourhood of
Saint-Michel and added is some areas from Hochelaga that went heavily
NDP in 2011. That area, around Maisonneuve Parc is a Liberal dead
zone, meaning the Liberals gain nothing from its inclusion. A
safe-ish Liberal seat turns into an NDP seat by 3865 votes.
Maurice-Richard
NDP +1, BQ
-1
From the looks of the map, this is one of two
new ridings that could claim to be the new seat added to the Island
of Montreal. It makes an NDP seat out of an area in mid-Montreal that
had none. The riding takes in the northern part of Ahuntsic, and
lumps it in with Saint-Michel and part of Saint-Leonard. The area
taken from Ahuntsic (and a small part of Papineau) voted BQ in 2011,
while the area taken from Saint-Leonard—Saint-Michel voted heavily
Liberal. But because the Liberals did terrible in northern Ahuntsic,
and the BQ even worse in Saint-Leonard—Saint-Michel, the NDP would
have won the riding by coming in 2nd in both areas. The
results would have been a tight 3 way race however, with the NDP
edging out the Liberals by just 920 votes and the BQ by 1462 votes.
The BQ's only seat on the island was in Ahuntsic, which is being
split between Maurice-Richard, George-Etienne-Cartier and Bourassa.
This split eliminated Ahuntsic riding from the map, and with in the
only BQ riding in Montreal. And since Maurice-Richard took the
largest amount of voters with it, I have credited this riding as the
one the BQ has lost due to redistribution.
George-Etienne-Cartier
Liberals +1
This is the other riding in Montreal that can
make the case for being brand new. The proposed riding straddles the
current Ahuntsic / Saint-Laurent—Cartierville riding border, taking
nearly equal parts from each. The southern end of Ahuntsic is the
Liberal end of that riding, while Cartierville and northern
Saint-Laurent (taken from Saint-Laurent—Cartierville) is also a
very Liberal area. The result of this new riding means the Liberals
gain a seat in the area to make up for the lost seat of
Saint-Leonard.
Sainte-Rose
NDP +1
With the population boom in Laval comes the new
riding of Sainte-Rose on the north side of the city. No longer will
Laval have a riding crossing its northern border onto the north shore
(Marc-Aurele-Fortin). The NDP swept the city in 2011, meaning that
any new riding would have also gone NDP, including Sainte-Rose.
Gaspe—Les Iles
NDP -1
With the population decline in Eastern Quebec,
the commission decided to eliminate a riding. The consequence of that
is the existing ridings had to get bigger. The NDP held riding of
Gaspesie—Iles-de-la-Madeline had to take in half of the riding of
Haute-Gaspesie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapedia. The election in
Gaspesie—Iles-de-la-Madeleine was already a close one between the
NDP and the BQ. The race in Haute-Gaspesie—La
Mitis—Matane—Matapedia was more between the Liberals and the Bloc
however, with the NDP in a distant third. With the Bloc doing well in
both parts of this new riding, they would have beaten the NDP by 2772
votes. This in effect eliminated the NDP seat in the Gaspesie, and
moves over the lone BQ riding in the area.
Levis
NDP +1,
Conservatives -1
Surprisingly enough, the proposed boundaries
would give the NDP a seat in the ultra-Conservative region of
Chaudiere-Appalaches. This region is where the Tories won four of
their five seats in the province in 2011. Levis takes in areas from
Levis—Bellechasse and from Lotbiniere—Chutes-de-la-Chaudiere that
went NDP in 2011, despite their ridings going Tory. The result is an
NDP win 1259 votes.
Soulanges
NDP +1
Soulanges is the name of a new riding in the
southwestern corner of Quebec, created as the result of the growth in
population in the area southwest of Montreal. The riding takes in
parts of two NDP held ridings, Beauharnois—Salaberry and from
Vaudreuil—Soulanges.
Outaouais
NDP +1
One new riding is being created in Western
Quebec, an area where all three seats had already gone NDP. That
means, no matter which of the four new ridings you consider to be the
new one, it too would have gone NDP. For the record, it looks like
the new riding might be that of “Outaouais” a riding made up of
the downtown core of Gatineau and Hull.
Atlantic Canada
Conservatives +1,
Liberals -1
There were no additions or subtractions to any
of the seat totals for any of Canada's four Atlantic provinces. In
fact one province, PEI had no boundary changes at all. There was
however one riding that would have switched parties thanks to the new
boundaries. That riding would have been Avalon, in
Newfoundland. Avalon is losing a large chunk of Liberal
territory (as I mentioned in my analysis of Newfoundland's
redistribution). The race in Avalon was close enough in 2011 that if
you take out enough Liberal territory, the riding would flip colours.
Under the new boundaries, the Tories would have won the seat by 1254
votes.
.png)
.PNG){kind=spacer}
